He put before them another parable:
"The kingdom of heaven may be compared to someone who sowed good seed in
his field; but while everybody was asleep, an enemy came and sowed weeds among
the wheat, and then went away. So when
the plants came up and bore grain, then the weeds appeared as well. And the slaves of the householder came and
said to him, 'Master, did you not sow good seed in your field? Where, then, did
these weeds come from?' He answered, 'An
enemy has done this.' The slaves said to him, 'Then do you want us to go and
gather them?' But he replied, 'No; for
in gathering the weeds you would uproot the wheat along with them. Let both of them grow together until the
harvest; and at harvest time I will tell the reapers, Collect the weeds first
and bind them in bundles to be burned, but gather the wheat into my
barn.'"
What
is the point of this parable? Some
people focus on the enemy, and develop from this parable a theology of Satan,
that he tries to infiltrate the ranks of the faithful with subversives who will
pollute the church and knock it off course. Similarly, some people focus on the weeds, that there are among us
those who are not true believers, and one day it will be revealed who those
imposters are, and they will be removed from our midst. And others focus
on the final destination of the weeds and the wheat, that there are some people
who will be gathered at the end to be burned in the eternal fires of hell, and
there are some people who will be gathered together to spend eternity in God’s
barn, in heaven.
I don’t think any of those is the point
that Jesus is trying to make. In fact, I
think all of those reflect a point of view that Jesus is in fact trying to
correct in the telling of this parable.
When Jimmy Carter gave an interview in which he talked about his
Christian faith, he used a term that was familiar to Southern Baptists and other
evangelicals, but unknown to most others, including a lot of Christians: born
again. The national media jumped on it
as a means of saying that Jimmy Carter was claiming to be a different kind of
Christian. I don’t think he was, he was
just using terminology that was common to his particular Christian upbringing.
Well, then evangelicals, and, in particular, Fundamentalists, who had
always kinda been using the phrase, really jumped on it, as a means of
distinguishing between the weeds and the wheat.
In other words, there were people who called themselves Christian who
really weren’t, and then there were the born-again Christians who believed in
the fundamentals of the faith, who didn’t preach a works-religion, who didn’t
baptize babies, who had walked down the aisle, prayed something called The
Sinner’s Prayer, been baptized, had Quiet Times, witnessed to sinners, and
served on church committees. And so
“Born Again” became something of a shibboleth: a word or phrase that showed you
were one of the faithful. If you had to
ask what a born-again Christian was, it’s because you weren’t one.
Religion often tends to separate people into the ins
and the outs. This mindset was rampant
among the Jews of Jesus’ time. There
were all kinds of groups that operated at different levels of exclusivity. There were the Essenes, and very exclusive
group that thought that all Judaism was corrupt and retreated to the caves
around the Dead Sea to get away from the impurity of the faith. There were the Sadducees, an elitist group
that tended to be the wealthy and respectable, who held to an orthodox,
conservative belief system but also advocated getting along with the
Romans. There were the Pharisees, a lay
group that was actually the more liberal group theologically. They believed that the reason Messiah hadn’t
come was because Israel was unfaithful to the law, and so they set about to be
extremely obedient down to the jot and tittle, and were judgmental of those who
wouldn’t do the same. And there were
even two different groups of Pharisees that followed the teachings of two
different rabbis and didn’t get along all that well with each other.
Each of these groups spent a lot of their time trying to weed out the fields, trying to separate the weeds from the wheat, the unfaithful from the faithful, the pretenders from the true believers.
Jesus says that’s not for us to do. I think the point of the parable is in the interchange between the slaves and the landowner. The slaves said to him, 'Then do you want us to go and gather them (the weeds)?' But he replied, 'No’.
It’s not our job to decide who’s in and who’s out. God will do that, and he’ll do it in his time.
The role of faith is to bring people together, not separate them. Reconciliation, not judgment, is the job of the follower of Jesus Christ.
It is this kind of life that Jesus calls us into.
Each of these groups spent a lot of their time trying to weed out the fields, trying to separate the weeds from the wheat, the unfaithful from the faithful, the pretenders from the true believers.
Jesus says that’s not for us to do. I think the point of the parable is in the interchange between the slaves and the landowner. The slaves said to him, 'Then do you want us to go and gather them (the weeds)?' But he replied, 'No’.
It’s not our job to decide who’s in and who’s out. God will do that, and he’ll do it in his time.
The role of faith is to bring people together, not separate them. Reconciliation, not judgment, is the job of the follower of Jesus Christ.
It is this kind of life that Jesus calls us into.
No comments:
Post a Comment