Walter Brueggeman (BREW-ga-mon), in The Prophetic Imagination, points out that the defining characteristic of the biblical prophets is not the ability to predict the future—and the way it is commonly understood today that wasn’t a characteristic of biblical prophecy at all—nor acting as the social conscience for ancient Israel, though they certainly did play this role.  The defining characteristic of biblical prophecy is the ability to imagine an alternative future to the one being played out according the accepted thinking of the day.  
Instead of “alternative future” I really wanted to write “alternative reality” but I was afraid that that would sound too heady, too philosophical, even too science-fictionesque.  But alternative reality really is better.  The prophet sees what is but doesn’t accept that this is what must be; further, the prophet is able to imagine a what-could-be and to vividly convey that image so that others can see it as well.  Furthermore, while the protectors of conventional thinking dismiss the prophet’s vision as an idealistic fantasy that will never work in the “real world,” the prophet sees his vision not only as what could be, but as what must be, and actively works to bring it to pass. 
The prophet and those who follow him form a sub-community within the dominant community, and this sub-community has certain characteristics:
1.      A common past that is kept alive through stories and song;
2.      A shared injustice that is readily and publicly acknowledged and is confessed to be unbearable over the long haul;
3.      A hope that is not just longed-for but actively pursued that unkept promises will be met; and
4.      A means of communication that is distinctive, imaginative, and deeply cherished.
Think of the civil rights movement of fifty years ago.  There was the memory of the slave experience passed down through generations and embodied in story and song; there was the injustice of Jim Crow, the pain of chronic poverty and abuse, and the unwillingness to accept that this would always be; a shared hope, best embodied by Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “I Have A Dream” speech, that claimed that the promises of our founding documents must be kept; and a form of discourse distinctive to the African-American community and deeply cherished by it—Black preaching, of course.  (MLK’s “I Have a Dream” is more sermon than it is speech.)
If this sounds strange and unfamiliar, then that is an indication that we have moved outside of the tradition of the biblical prophets, and that is dangerous because it was within this stream that Jesus most identified himself.  Of all the roles assigned to him by his contemporaries—rabbi, priest, king, prophet—this is the one that Jesus embraced.  He came preaching an alternative reality with an alternative future, which he called the Kingdom  of God 
Christians don’t talk about the Kingdom  of God Kingdom   of God Kingdom  of God 
We better get this right if we are going to continue to claim to be followers of Jesus.
”Celebration of Hope” is about pursuing the Kingdom   of God 
This is not some little thing that we are doing.  It is the thing that we are supposed to be pursuing.




 
 
He also came demonstrating this alternative reality with every miracle He manifested, or so I believe. And He mentioned that the Kingdom of God had already come--for those who could 'see' it. You are right. It is the thing.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Larry, for the reminder.